Introduction Last year’s decision of the Employment Tribunal in Scott v Walker Morris LLP sheds light on steps that LLPs and partnerships ought to be taking in relation to their retirement provisions and how they deal with partners or LLP members (all referred to in this article as “partners”) who do not wish to retire….
The recent case of Cobden v Cobden [2024] explores the jurisdiction of the court in a partnership dissolution to permit one partner to buy out the other, rather than ordering a sale of partnership assets and division of the proceeds. The judgment contains a comprehensive review of the law relating to Syers orders, including in…
Partnership dissolution is often misunderstood, not only as to what it entails, but also as to what the outcomes may be. When partners seek to “weaponise” the dissolution of a partnership, as a means of taking a business forward, while leaving one of the partners behind/excluding him from further participation, further important considerations arise.
Losses resulting from expulsion following whistleblowing can be very substantial, and there is no statutory limit on the amount of compensation that can be awarded.
But in some cases the expulsion of the whistleblower may:
In such circumstances it may be argued by the continuing LLP members that the chain of causation between the whistleblowing and the whistleblower’s loss brought about by the expulsion of the whistleblower has been broken, and that accordingly no recoverable loss arises.
The Court of Appeal decision earlier this year in Wilsons Solicitors & others v Roberts brings such scenarios sharply back into focus.
(This article was first published on the Kluwer Mediation Blog on 7 March 2017)
…the typical all-powerful and largely irreplaceable partner of yore has evolved to become a powerless, placeholder partner, keeping the chair warm for the next incumbent of his post. He is the counterpoint to, and the prey of, the predator partner.
This has radically altered how many partnership disputes, especially in the professions, tend to arise and are resolved.
The case of Campbell v Campbell [2017] serves as a prime example of the need for business partners trading through any type of business vehicle to record the precise terms of their business relationship with one another at the outset. It is also a good illustration of a WATNA (worst alternative to a negotiated agreement)….
I previously reported on the case of Moore v Moore (2016), in which the court ordered, based on proprietary estoppel, that a farmer’s son was entitled to take over his father’s interest in the family farming partnership, despite the fact that the father wanted to leave his interest to another family member in his will….
In the case of Hosking v Marathon Asset Management LLP [2016] EWHC 2418 (Ch) the court had to answer the question, “Whether the share of profits of a partner of a partnership or a member of an LLP, paid out pursuant to and in accordance with a partnership or LLP deed, can be subject to…
On an appeal in the case of Dhillon v Sandhu (2014 WL 5411909) His Honour Judge Hodge QC (sitting as a High Court Judge) has affirmed the application of sanctions imposed by an unless order made by Chief Master Marsh in the course of the taking of a partnership account. The judgment gives guidance as…
…an historic rock and roll theme… In the case of Achom v Lalic [2014] the claimants (for whom I acted) had reached an understanding with the defendants whereby the defendants would acquire night club premises in Mayfair and the parties would together develop those premises into an exclusive night club with an historic rock and…
“… if the answer to any of these questions is, “No,” there may be a problem …” Following the Supreme Court judgment in Seldon, how do professional practices quickly determine whether or not they should be taking advice on their current partner or LLP member retirement provisions, with a view to minimising the risk of…
“… In these difficult times, in which many professional practices are facing potential or actual insolvency, it is important for “partners” to know what liabilities they face …” Last week’s Court of Appeal judgment in the case of Tiffin v Lester Aldridge LLP [2012] EWCA Civ 35 has brought more certainty to the frequently arising…
“… The classic example that is often given is where a firm has contracted to build a bridge, and dissolution occurs when only half of the bridge has been built …” The recent case of Boghani v Nathoo [2011] EWHC 2101 (Ch) (judgment 2 August 2011) is a useful modern authority relating to the obligation…
Partnership dissolution FAQs: What is dissolution? In the partnership context, “dissolution” describes both an event and a process : Continue Reading
If you’d like to discuss your situation on a confidential, no obligation basis, please contact me.
